churchhistoryРоссийский журнал истории ЦерквиRussian Journal of Church History2686-973X2687-069XSilicea-Poligraf LLC10.15829/2686-973X-2020-4-44churchhistory-44Research ArticleПубликация источниковPublication of sourcesЧума как средство религиозной полемикиPlague as a means of religious controversyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-2336МетлицкаяЗ. Ю.MetlitskayaZ. Yu.

Метлицкая Зоя Юрьевна, кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры Истории Церкви исторического факультета

Москва

Zoya Yu. Metlitskaya, PhD, Associate professor of Department of Church History

Moscow

cerdic@yandex.ruМГУ им. М. В. ЛомоносоваLomonosov Moscow State University202031122020145563Copyright © Метлицкая З.Ю., 20202020Метлицкая З.Ю.Metlitskaya Z.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://churchhistory.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/44

Перевод трактата члена общества Джорджа Уайтхеда, содержащего критику позиции Церкви Англии в период эпидемии чумы в Лондоне в 1665 году.

Translation of a treatise by George Whitehead, a member of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), criticizing the position of the Church of England during the Great Plague of London, 1665-1666.

общество квакеровВеликая чума в ЛондонеДжордж УайтхедSociety of FriendsQuakersthe Great Plague of LondonGeorge WhiteheadReferencesDefoe 1722 — Defoe, D. (1722). The Journal of plague year. Publ. E. Nutt. London.Defoe 1722 — Defoe, D. (1722). The Journal of plague year. Publ. E. Nutt. London.Hodges 1672 — Hodges, N. (1672). Loimologia, sive Pestis nuperæ apud Populum Londinensem grassantis Narratio Historica. London.Hodges 1672 — Hodges, N. (1672). Loimologia, sive Pestis nuperæ apud Populum Londinensem grassantis Narratio Historica. London.Whitehead 1665 — Whitehead, G. (1665). No remission without repentance nor will a bare confession without a real forsaking of sin avail to the averting God’s heavy visitation and judgments from this nation of England, the cause whereof being somewhat more fully declared herein then is confessed in the fast which was appointed for the averting of the same heavy visitation and this concerns both the rulers, clergy, and people of London and Westminster and all parts of this realm to look into and lay to heart who are concerned in the observation of the said fast to consider what fruits they bring forth and whether the end of the true fast be answered by them yea or nea, according to Isa. 58. London.Whitehead 1665 — Whitehead, G. (1665). No remission without repentance nor will a bare confession without a real forsaking of sin avail to the averting God’s heavy visitation and judgments from this nation of England, the cause whereof being somewhat more fully declared herein then is confessed in the fast which was appointed for the averting of the same heavy visitation and this concerns both the rulers, clergy, and people of London and Westminster and all parts of this realm to look into and lay to heart who are concerned in the observation of the said fast to consider what fruits they bring forth and whether the end of the true fast be answered by them yea or nea, according to Isa. 58. London.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.