Preview

Russian Journal of Church History

Advanced search

Radical Orthodoxy as a Response to the Challenges of Modernism and Postmodernism

https://doi.org/10.15829/2686-973X-2025-204

EDN: YOBHEP

Abstract

This article examines "Radical Orthodoxy" as a major development in contemporary theological thought, which emerged in English- language academic discourse in the late 1990s. The study analyses the movement’s core principles and intellectual programme, explores the reasons for its appeal, and situates it within the broader post- secular turn. Drawing on primary sources — including the work of John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock, and Graham Ward — alongside recent scholarship, the article employs methods from intellectual history and comparative analysis. It identifies six key concepts in Radical Orthodoxy (participation; rejection of secular dualism; being as gift; knowledge as anticipation; the social dimension of salvation; the analogy of being), together with its socio- political commitments (critique of secularisation, Christian socialism, social responsibility, and the interrelation of theology and politics). The author presents the movement as combining a polemic against both modernism and postmodernism with an effort to set out a comprehensive theological worldview rooted in tradition. The article’s innovation lies in highlighting parallels between Radical Orthodoxy and earlier forms of Christian modernism as contrasting responses to the intellectual challenges of their respective eras. The author argues that the movement’s popularity reflects a wider cultural search for integrated worldviews that unite faith, reason, and social practice.

About the Author

I. D. Shnol
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Iakov D. Shnol — postgraduate student, Department of Church History, Faculty of History

Moscow



References

1. Milbank, J. (2013). Christianity will be revived only if it strives to rethink everything in a Christian way. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 3(31), 285-290. (In Russ.) Милбанк Д. (2013). "Христианство возродится только в том случае, если будет стараться все заново переосмыслить по-христиански...". Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом, 3 (31), 285-290.

2. Cavanaugh, W. T. (1999). The World in a Wafer: A Geography of the Eucharist as Resistance to Globalization. Modern Theology, 15(4), 181-203. doi:10.1111/1468-0025.00093.

3. Hemming, L. P. (2004). Analogia non Entis sed Entitatis: The Ontological Consequences of the Doctrine of Analogy. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 6(2), 118-128. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2400.2004.00124.x.

4. Milbank, J. (1990). Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Blackwell Publishing, 488 p.

5. Milbank, J. (2003). Being Reconciled. Ontology and Pardon. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 94 р.

6. Milbank, J. (1997). The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language and Culture. Wiley-­Blackwell.

7. Peterson, J. (2024). We Who Wrestle with God: Perceptions of the Divine. Random House Penguin, 576 p.

8. Pickstock, C. (1997). After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-­Blackwell.

9. Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology. Ed(s). John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock, Graham Ward. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 1999. 300 р. doi:10.4324/9780203046197.

10. Reno, R. R. (2000). "The Radical Orthodoxy Project". First Things, 100 (February), 42 p.

11. Rowland, T. (2003). Culture and the Thomist Tradition: After Vatican II. London: Routledge.

12. Ward, G. (2017). Radical Orthodoxy: Its Ecumenical Vision, Acta Theologica, 39.


Review

For citations:


Shnol I.D. Radical Orthodoxy as a Response to the Challenges of Modernism and Postmodernism. Russian Journal of Church History. 2025;6(3):60-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/2686-973X-2025-204. EDN: YOBHEP

Views: 108


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-973X (Print)
ISSN 2687-069X (Online)